Role of British agencies in Syria
The information gathered over several years eliminates all doubt about the role of official British agencies in Syria and their involvement with various organizations in the Syrian conflict. We even have gathered the names of individuals with dual citizenship—Syrian-British, Syrian-European, and Syrian-American—who were working with extremist organizations.
Robert Ford, the former U.S. ambassador to Syria, made several statements specifically referencing British involvement with al-Qaeda in Syria.
And over the past ten months alone, we can trace their movements in Syria, both at the official level and through their agents, who continue to work to consolidate al-Qaeda’s rule in the country.
Questions persist about why British agencies are involved with extremist Islamic groups. A look at recent history reveals disasters perpetrated by British agencies in the Eastern Mediterranean region, with two of the most significant events being the partition of Cyprus and the support of extremist factions in Syria.
The leak of an unverified document, widely circulated on social media, did not emerge out of nowhere. While the document’s content is not new, its timing is significant.
We must seek answers to the big questions, some of which we already know:
What is the plan of the British organizations operating in Syria?
Why did British agencies contribute to issuing a document under the name of an American-Christian organization to support the rule of Ahmed al-Sharaa (al-Jolani)?
Why did they choose an American-Christian organization, most of whose members are based outside the United States, to support Al-Qaeda?
More news on our YouTube and Rumble channels
